Comments for Nigeria Climate Reports http://ngrclimatereports.com ...Information on climate change as it happens Fri, 28 May 2010 14:29:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 Comment on Contact Us by Mr david max http://ngrclimatereports.com/?page_id=14&cpage=1#comment-588 Mr david max Fri, 28 May 2010 14:29:49 +0000 http://localhost/Work%20Files/climate/?page_id=14#comment-588 WORLD BANK £800 MILLION PROJECTS APPROVAL. 1. Investing on climate change projects(short/long policy term investment) 2. Climate change project (Reining/control of carbon emissions) These projects were approved to check the depletion of ozone layer,greenhouse effect by the system known as clean development mechanism (CDM) lunched at china.Developing countries need support and finance to invest while 1.6 billion people lack access to clean energy investment. This allow developed countries to meet their greenhouse gasses target by investing in clean energy projects in the developing world. China now believed to be the world's biggest source of greenhouse gasses to make more substantive commitments to reducing carbon emissions. These were disclosed and approved by Mr Robert zoellick, president world bank saying that,this is an important part of dealing with climate changes. The world bank basically serves as a guarantor and strongly supporting the(CDM projects) with the sum,so that other developing countries will benefit from it. Mr Robert zoellick and boards call for the attention of the Government,National climatic organizations,climate change investors to support in this global target. You are hereby informed by the board for this global opportunities . summit your abstract immediately(contract) Best Regards Mr. Robert Zoellick. President world bank r_zoellick@mail2london.com website:http://go.worldbank.org/5KEV3MJSX0 Mr David max max projects consulting World bank Projects New Zealand House Hay market London, SW1Y 4TE E-mail to davidmax@mail2consultant.com Tel: +447045797221 +447024004696 This email is confidential and has been scanned by the Message Labs e-mail Security System visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email NOTE: FOR INVESTORS ONLY. 1.Short/long policy term investment should be indicated on the application. 2.Short term investment(1year- 2years) long term(2years-above). 3.High returns on investment. 4.Can be use as security for loan. 5.High early partial maturity payment(50%). 6.Tax free maturity benefit. 7. free insurance benefit. © 2010 The World Bank Group, All Rights Reserved. WORLD BANK £800 MILLION PROJECTS APPROVAL.

1. Investing on climate change projects(short/long policy term investment)

2. Climate change project (Reining/control of carbon emissions)

These projects were approved to check the depletion of ozone layer,greenhouse
effect by the system known as clean development mechanism (CDM) lunched
at china.Developing countries need support and finance to invest while 1.6 billion
people lack access to clean energy investment.

This allow developed countries to meet their greenhouse gasses target
by investing in clean energy projects in the developing world.
China now believed to be the world’s biggest source of greenhouse gasses to
make more substantive commitments to reducing carbon emissions.

These were disclosed and approved by Mr Robert zoellick, president world bank
saying that,this is an important part of dealing with climate changes.

The world bank basically serves as a guarantor and strongly supporting the(CDM
projects) with the sum,so that other developing countries will benefit from it.

Mr Robert zoellick and boards call for the attention of the Government,National
climatic organizations,climate change investors to support in this global target.
You are hereby informed by the board for this global opportunities .

summit your abstract immediately(contract)

Best Regards
Mr. Robert Zoellick.
President world bank
r_zoellick@mail2london.com
website:http://go.worldbank.org/5KEV3MJSX0

Mr David max
max projects consulting
World bank Projects
New Zealand House
Hay market
London, SW1Y 4TE
E-mail to davidmax@mail2consultant.com
Tel: +447045797221
+447024004696

This email is confidential and has been scanned by the Message Labs
e-mail Security System
visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email

NOTE: FOR INVESTORS ONLY.
1.Short/long policy term investment should be indicated on the application.
2.Short term investment(1year- 2years)
long term(2years-above).
3.High returns on investment.
4.Can be use as security for loan.
5.High early partial maturity payment(50%).
6.Tax free maturity benefit.
7. free insurance benefit.

© 2010 The World Bank Group, All Rights Reserved.

]]> Comment on Contact Us by emaibemepay http://ngrclimatereports.com/?page_id=14&cpage=1#comment-577 emaibemepay Wed, 26 May 2010 11:55:49 +0000 http://localhost/Work%20Files/climate/?page_id=14#comment-577 <a href="http://www.buyclothingonlinestore.com/dolce-and-gabbana-brand3.html" rel="nofollow">D&G</a> new models old price!!! Good stuff!!!!!! Take invites: Summer15 - 15%. D&G new models old price!!!

Good stuff!!!!!!
Take invites:
Summer15 – 15%.

]]> Comment on OIL AND GAS SECTOR REFORMS IN NIGERIA: WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW by KELEWAMS http://ngrclimatereports.com/?p=5&cpage=1#comment-562 KELEWAMS Fri, 21 May 2010 06:58:03 +0000 http://localhost/Work%20Files/climate/?p=3#comment-562 When u trace the history of oil devastation since 1937 when the exploration started, thru 1958 when the first shipment commenced, to current when entire regions and creeks have become unfit for any life, both human and animal and even plants, you would notice those who have borne the brunt of despicable environmental decay, are in the Niger Delta. Yet, the showpiece of Nigerian oil money is not in the regoin. The region has continued to experience worse human and material poverty beyond imagination. I know families with oil wells in their backyard, yet can't send their kids to college. Why? So far as this so-called new oil policy is concerned the main effort should be to correct old ills and compensate the region and its' people and establish infrstructures fit for an oil producing area. 2ndly, all oil related facilities should be situated in that zone. 3rdly, Board membership regarding petroleum and gas matters must have Niger Deltans as majority. Fourthly, special economic/loan package with training should be established for those, varifiably, have lost means of livelihood due to oil industry activities. There are many ways a new oil/gas policy can work for those who have and are suffering from oil devastation. That's what PIB ought to do. When u trace the history of oil devastation since 1937 when the exploration started, thru 1958 when the first shipment commenced, to current when entire regions and creeks have become unfit for any life, both human and animal and even plants, you would notice those who have borne the brunt of despicable environmental decay, are in the Niger Delta. Yet, the showpiece of Nigerian oil money is not in the regoin. The region has continued to
experience worse human and material poverty beyond imagination. I know families with oil wells in their backyard, yet can’t send their kids to college. Why? So far as this so-called new oil policy is concerned the main
effort should be to correct old ills and compensate the region and its’ people and establish infrstructures fit for an oil producing area. 2ndly, all oil related facilities should be situated in that zone. 3rdly, Board membership regarding petroleum and gas matters must have Niger Deltans as majority. Fourthly, special economic/loan
package with training should be established for those,
varifiably, have lost means of livelihood due to oil industry activities. There are many ways a new oil/gas policy can work for those who have and are suffering from oil devastation. That’s what PIB ought to do.

]]> Comment on EU: Future Negotiations to Focus Development Dimensions of EPA by Rilwan Abdullahi http://ngrclimatereports.com/?p=537&cpage=1#comment-560 Rilwan Abdullahi Tue, 18 May 2010 23:38:57 +0000 http://ngrclimatereports.com/?p=537#comment-560 Reading this report reminds me of the song titled 'MICKEY MOUSE FREEDOM' by the late Lucky Dube of blessed memory. Reading this report reminds me of the song titled ‘MICKEY MOUSE FREEDOM’ by the late Lucky Dube of blessed memory.

]]> Comment on AU to Harmonize Position on Climate Change Today by Jesse http://ngrclimatereports.com/?p=285&cpage=1#comment-550 Jesse Tue, 11 May 2010 08:04:45 +0000 http://ngrclimatereports.com/?p=285#comment-550 DO you mind if I use this information on my essay? That's about green environment. I will properly cite you. DO you mind if I use this information on my essay? That’s about green environment. I will properly cite you.

]]> Comment on Kaduna Refinery Environment for Remediate by Fortune http://ngrclimatereports.com/?p=529&cpage=1#comment-498 Fortune Sat, 24 Apr 2010 10:42:44 +0000 http://ngrclimatereports.com/?p=529#comment-498 This is a good work. Keep is up. This is a good work. Keep is up.

]]> Comment on OIL AND GAS SECTOR REFORMS IN NIGERIA: WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW by OFUROKUMO http://ngrclimatereports.com/?p=5&cpage=1#comment-399 OFUROKUMO Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:22:43 +0000 http://localhost/Work%20Files/climate/?p=3#comment-399 Why is it that in a committe of 22 people we have 9 hausa/fulani and only 3 or 4 Niger Deltans who domain this huge resources is taken. Why is the National petroleum research Institute which is sited in KADUNA captured in this PIB and PTI and Petroleum Uni both in Delta state are not captured since the PIB is meant to overhaul the old system we have been operating. No wonder the Petro Uni and PTI are underfunded. Why is it that Niger Deltans are not given special quoter in the PTDF scholarships to show that govt want human development for these people. There is no sincerity in this bil. Why is it that in a committe of 22 people we have 9 hausa/fulani and only 3 or 4 Niger Deltans who domain this huge resources is taken. Why is the National petroleum research Institute which is sited in KADUNA captured in this PIB and PTI and Petroleum Uni both in Delta state are not captured since the PIB is meant to overhaul the old system we have been operating. No wonder the Petro Uni and PTI are underfunded. Why is it that Niger Deltans are not given special quoter in the PTDF scholarships to show that govt want human development for these people.
There is no sincerity in this bil.

]]> Comment on OIL AND GAS SECTOR REFORMS IN NIGERIA: WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW by Chukwuemeka Okorie, LLM, Petroleum Law & Policy (Dundee) http://ngrclimatereports.com/?p=5&cpage=1#comment-186 Chukwuemeka Okorie, LLM, Petroleum Law & Policy (Dundee) Sat, 14 Nov 2009 11:50:10 +0000 http://localhost/Work%20Files/climate/?p=3#comment-186 The proposition for the 10% equity in the IJV under the PIB is very loudable. This is the very first time such an idea reflecting a modicum of consideration of resource control by the Niger Delta states is being demonstrated by the Nigerian government. Resource control in a thriving state has always remained a constitutional issue. The Nigerian grundnorm, the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (CFRN), 1999, vests ownership over natural resources in the Federal Government. Social change, unless vide a revolution which has become grosso modo effective under the Kelsen's theory, should ever be a graduate continuum. The PIB as it is should only address the basis of the equity holding- whether by a committee of the 8 Niger Delta states or a share of the 10 percent amongst them on the basis of an a legally prescribed formula. This will serve the indigenious Niger Delta peoples' agitations in the meantime and preserve the fledgling peace in the Niger Delta. A recommendation to amend the CFRN and the Land Use Decree of 1978 which has acquired a quasi-constitutional status and so has become an important substratum of the Nigerian society, will amount to "asking for too much". Such an attempt would delay the speedy passage into law of the PIB- which has become the only feasible respite for the restiveness of the Niger Deltans- and would likely return us back to where we just came out from, another historic human predation! God forbid. Therefore, all efforts should be geared towards passing the PIB subject to clarification of a few issues as pointed above. The PIB should also make provision for compulsory unitisation of oil fields to avoid competitive drilling by the IOCs since the modern trend is towards maximum recovery of the resource and sustainable exploitation of the fast depleting resource. Countries like the USA (where the rule of capture originated from) and the UK have done it. It is recommended that we (Nigeria) follow the trend positive trend, rather than the present regime of contractual provision which we all know do not have as much force. Finally, it needs to be pointed out that the PIB is a step in the right direction for the Nigerian Government and the Nigerian people. Politics should step aside while we focus more on the sustainability of peaceful co-existence in Nigeria and for the sake of the Nigeria's posterity! The proposition for the 10% equity in the IJV under the PIB is very loudable. This is the very first time such an idea reflecting a modicum of consideration of resource control by the Niger Delta states is being demonstrated by the Nigerian government. Resource control in a thriving state has always remained a constitutional issue. The Nigerian grundnorm, the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (CFRN), 1999, vests ownership over natural resources in the Federal Government.

Social change, unless vide a revolution which has become grosso modo effective under the Kelsen’s theory, should ever be a graduate continuum. The PIB as it is should only address the basis of the equity holding- whether by a committee of the 8 Niger Delta states or a share of the 10 percent amongst them on the basis of an a legally prescribed formula. This will serve the indigenious Niger Delta peoples’ agitations in the meantime and preserve the fledgling peace in the Niger Delta.

A recommendation to amend the CFRN and the Land Use Decree of 1978 which has acquired a quasi-constitutional status and so has become an important substratum of the Nigerian society, will amount to “asking for too much”. Such an attempt would delay the speedy passage into law of the PIB- which has become the only feasible respite for the restiveness of the Niger Deltans- and would likely return us back to where we just came out from, another historic human predation! God forbid.

Therefore, all efforts should be geared towards passing the PIB subject to clarification of a few issues as pointed above. The PIB should also make provision for compulsory unitisation of oil fields to avoid competitive drilling by the IOCs since the modern trend is towards maximum recovery of the resource and sustainable exploitation of the fast depleting resource. Countries like the USA (where the rule of capture originated from) and the UK have done it. It is recommended that we (Nigeria) follow the trend positive trend, rather than the present regime of contractual provision which we all know do not have as much force.

Finally, it needs to be pointed out that the PIB is a step in the right direction for the Nigerian Government and the Nigerian people. Politics should step aside while we focus more on the sustainability of peaceful co-existence in Nigeria and for the sake of the Nigeria’s posterity!

]]> Comment on Contact Us by Debbie Legall http://ngrclimatereports.com/?page_id=14&cpage=1#comment-184 Debbie Legall Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:43:12 +0000 http://localhost/Work%20Files/climate/?page_id=14#comment-184 Dear Sirs I am trying to contact you in relation to an article I am writing for International Bar News, an international legal journal - about the PiB. I would be interested in interviewing you. Please send me your emaill address so that I may send my question to you via email message. I look forward to hearing from you. Thanks Dear Sirs
I am trying to contact you in relation to an article I am writing for International Bar News, an international legal journal – about the PiB.
I would be interested in interviewing you. Please send me your emaill address so that I may send my question to you via email message.
I look forward to hearing from you.

Thanks

]]> Comment on OIL AND GAS SECTOR REFORMS IN NIGERIA: WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW by Professor Wumi Iledare http://ngrclimatereports.com/?p=5&cpage=1#comment-170 Professor Wumi Iledare Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:48:01 +0000 http://localhost/Work%20Files/climate/?p=3#comment-170 Quite a great summary of the petroleum bill. The IJV seems to be an innovative idea with quite a lot of issues to be resolved. I read in the paper today the proposal ro surrender or give 10 percent equity in the proposed IJV to the communiity. Another great innovation, but I am just wondering the implication of this idea on the financial efficency of the IJV. How would the Niger Delta Community managed the 10 percent equity stock? Can one be led to believe that the Federal government is just trying to get around the constiutional banned on resource ownership, which tends to bar the oil communities to get royalty directly form IOCs Would the state not be better off to take direct royalty from the IOCs? I think the idea of a State of the fedearation being a part owner of the IJV is not efficient, effective or equitable. A more pragmatic and less detrimental to the pursuant of operational efficency in resource development is to allow the state to take ownership of resources onshore and be responsible for leasing and licensing and taxing. But this may require constiutional ammendment and the repealing of the land use decree. Quite a great summary of the petroleum bill. The IJV seems to be an innovative idea with quite a lot of issues to be resolved.

I read in the paper today the proposal ro surrender or give 10 percent equity in the proposed IJV to the communiity. Another great innovation, but I am just wondering the implication of this idea on the financial efficency of the IJV. How would the Niger Delta Community managed the 10 percent equity stock? Can one be led to believe that the Federal government is just trying to get around the constiutional banned on resource ownership, which tends to bar the oil communities to get royalty directly form IOCs

Would the state not be better off to take direct royalty from the IOCs? I think the idea of a State of the fedearation being a part owner of the IJV is not efficient, effective or equitable. A more pragmatic and less detrimental to the pursuant of operational efficency in resource development is to allow the state to take ownership of resources onshore and be responsible for leasing and licensing and taxing. But this may require constiutional ammendment and the repealing of the land use decree.

]]>